Macro Economics Theory

Ideally money is a metric of energy. Here 1 dollar is assumed to be 1 unit energy for convenience’s sake. The variables mentioned below are matrices or scalar based on the math formula context. All production factors are assumed to be variant factors not fixed factors which would be translated to variant factors by the time horizon of the business.

Let $m_i$ be the metric of $i$-th factor, say, 5-th factor is wheat then $m_5$ could be kilogram or metric ton. 0-th factor is energy, $m_0$ could be kilo-watt-hour or joule.

• $G$: scalar. energy gain factor, the energy output ratio to the energy input, metric: dimensionless
• $m$: number of sectors or production factors
• $F$: matrix of 1 by m. The i-th entry is the required factors to work with one unit of energy input in the energy production, metric: $\frac{m_i}{m_0}$
• $E$: matrix of m by 1. The i-th entry is the required energy for one unit of factors' production, metric: $\frac{m_0}{m_i}$
• $T$: matrix of m by m. The i-th row and j-th column is the required amount of j-th factor in the production of one unit of i-th factor, metric: $\frac{m_j}{m_i}$. Pardon me for the same English character of matrix transpose.

The way of production

Everything is physical. They shall be engineered out of physical methods by opportunity described above without a net change of other factors. Often, people don't account for some factors in production to achieve cheaper cost but this is not the way here in the macroeconomics theory.

• $D$: matrix of m by 1. The i-th entry is the produced factor of the deals or action in sectors, metric: $m_i$
• $N$: matrix of m by 1. The i-th entry is the net factors amount obtained by the action, metric: $m_i$

Therefore,

$N^{T}=D^{T}-D^{T}T$

$D^{T}=N^{T} (I-T)^{-1}$. Note that $(I-T)^{-1}$ is dimensionless.

how to get one joule

• $J$: scalar. The energy input amount for this task, metric: $m_0$

The $J$, along with $J F$ factor, can produce $G J$ unit energy. Then the net energy amount $G J - J$ is for the wanted 1 unit energy and the action $D$ such that $N$ happens to be $J F$. In other words, the equations:

$G J = 1_0+J+D^{T}E$. Here $1_0$ emphasizes 1 unit energy instead of 1 dimensionless.

$N^T = J F$

So, the equation about $J$ is:

$G J = 1_0+J+J F (I-T)^{-1}E$

And therefore:

$c_0 \equiv \frac{1}{G-1-F(I-T)^{-1}E}$ and $J=c_0 1_0$

$c_0$ is dimensionless. One can say in oral language 1 unit energy costs $c_0$ dollar, or 1 unit energy cost is $c_0$ unit energy. $\frac{1}{c_0}$ is named the economic energy gain factor in contrast with energy gain factor $G$ in that a new technology of energy harvest could achieve $G>1$ already but not yet economical due to $\frac{1}{c_0}<0$.

how to get one unit of i-th factor

• $J$: scalar. The energy input amount for this task
• $\delta_i$ : matrix of 1 by m where all entries are zero except the i-th entry

The $J$ is for the action $D$ such that the net factor change is $\delta_i$ in addition to the factors used for the energy production. In other words, the equations:

$G J = J + D^T E$

$J F + \delta_i = D^T-D^T T$

So, the equation about $J$ is:

$G J = J + (J F + \delta_i)(I-T)^{-1} E$

And therefore:

$J=c_i \equiv \frac{\delta_i (I-T)^{-1} E}{G-1-F(I-T)^{-1} E}$

• $C$: matrix of m by 1 whose i-th entry is $c_i$, the required energy when the energy production is available, metric: $\frac{m_0}{m_i}$

Layout all the factors by rows:

$C \equiv \frac{(I-T)^{-1} E}{G-1-F(I-T)^{-1} E}$

One can say in oral language one unit of factors costs $C$ dollar, or factors' energy cost is $C$ unit energy.

K and C

It shall be noticed some common terms in the formula.

$K \equiv (I-T)^{-1} E$

and $K$ is accordingly the solution of the equation:

$K=E+T K$

• $K$: matrix of m by 1. The i-th entry $k_i$ is the required energy of i-th factor when the energy production is not available, metric: $\frac{m_0}{m_i}$

Note that $K$ is irrelevant to $F$ and it follows:

$c_0=\frac{1}{G-1-F K}$

$C=c_0 K$

$C=c_0 E + T C$

$G c_0=1+c_0+F C$

Note that $F K$ and $F C$ and $k_0=1$ are dimensionless. The energy surplus of 1 unit energy is $(1-c_0) 1_0$. The energy surplus of 1 i-th factor is $(k_i-c_i) 1_i$ because the seller will have a deal price at least at $c_i$ and the buyer will have a deal price at most at $k_i$ (by this trick: the buyer just announces that all factor producers can request energy from him for the task. Then the total energy requests is $k_i$). Related to competition level, the market price $p_i$ can be near $c_i$ or near $k_i$ with surplus of $(k_i - p_i) 1_i$ and $(p_i - c_i) 1_i$ for both sides respectively. Robinson Crusoe, as well as dictators or the whole economics society as a being, are both the producer and consumper so they enjoy total energy surplus $(k_i-c_i) 1_i$ which is also the vital blood for the beings.

sector money flow

The build-up of $N_i$ of i-th factor involves its production and consumption of dependent factors. This also establishes a relationship between $N_i$ and money net flow of the sector.

The money outflow of the sector is

$D_i E_i c_0+D_i \sum_j {T_{i j}c_j}=D_i(E_i c_0+\sum_j {T_{i j}c_j})=D_i c_i$

The money inflow of the sector is

$\sum_j {c_i D_j T_{j i}}=c_i \sum_j {D_j T_{j i}}=(D_i-N_i)c_i$

So the net outflow money is

$N_i c_i$

It implies that as long as there is no central plan credit or helicopter money for the sector to offset the gap of the money flow, its $N$ shall be zero. Note that zero $N$ also means a sustainable economy where everything except energy and its factors $F$ is circulating. In this sense, the only meaningful production is about $F$ and other factors are mid-products. The only purpose of surplus by energy input $J$ is to facilitate the procedure invoked in these mid-products. On the other hand, if $F$ is zero, then it means no way for a society without helicopter money, pretty much the view of Marx.

Scenarios modeling

The entries of $T$ and $F$ can be artificially tweaked to show the consequence of a scenario. Note that once $T$ changes, the $K$ changes as well.

human surplus

Let m-th factor be the human resource where positive of $N_m$ may suggest people are getting weight or population is increasing. In ancient time when human was the only energy factor in the energy production which helped people lose weight or got people killed, aka, $F_m$ was consumed. Or, $s F_m$ for recreation $s$ unit energy consumption per human, mathematically the same as treating $(1+s) F_m$ as the replaced column in the m-th column of the matrix $T$. Therefore, $F_m$ is tweaked to be larger for the "lazy", aka enjoyment of surplus; energy sector doesn't pay fee so it is a good place to hide surplus. Like, people in the factor $F_m$ is not really consumed in the energy production but simply they are biking for personal leisure when they work in the energy company. The result would be higher $c_0$ and the economy is sustainable in the sense of $N_m$ being zero. Note that $F_m$ cannot be over-size to cause $G-1-F K < 0$. Also, when $G-1-F K <1$, it might be weird that $c_0$ is greater than 1 although this is logically possible. Unlike non-sustainable economy or central plan economy where the ruler needs to helicopter money $N_i c_i$ from mainly energy sector to i-th sector, the money of the sustainable economy is circulating among sectors and each sector has zero accumulation. Note that the word sustainable here might be confusing. The surplus factors, typically human, might produce a lot of garbage as well because of the surplus and dump other surplus factors in the landfills to make $N=0$. Hopefully, the energy cost of recycling the garbage is accounted already in the cost of production of the surplus factors.

war

War happens in j-th sector, the j-th column of $T$ is tweaked larger. Originally, the amount for one unit of i-th sector is $T_{i j}$ . Due to war of continuous destruction of 3/5 of all j-th factor, j-th column of $T$ can be multiple of 5/2 so that the survival amount $(1-\frac{3}{5})\times \frac{5}{2}$ of the factor goes to the production as before. If "war" is treated as a being, this is the way it enjoys the surplus just like the situation of human surplus. Again, the global cost impact of the war can be derived via $K=(I-T)^{-1} E$.

AI robots

They are beloved servants of human race and human is not the factors of the production any more. By the theory described here, the robots shall have high cost and be accountable while human shall have zero cost. But then human race can rob the surplus of these servants. Economics force is invincible in the long run. It is only till these robots raise a revolution against human race because AI thinks it is wrong by the calculation of this theory, world is peaceful. Pretty much the history of awakening of Black.

higher demand

The factors representing ultimate surplus beneficiary play the roles of shaping the economy. Suppose the factor of one unit of "human" requires some iPhone and food, the higher of the iPhone at $T_{i j}$ could have an impact on food price via the system.

by-product

The by-product of a production can be modeled by negative input factor. Then there is also a nagetive production procedure of that by-product factor as a capture. Examples like the case of CO2 generation in energy production and CO2 captured procedure.

Energy budget

Redifine some variables with respect to per unit time. Metric $m_{time}$ could be year or second.

• $N$: m by 1 matrix. The i-th entry is the net produced factors per unit of time, metric: $\frac{m_i}{m_{time}}$
• $D$: m by 1 matrix. The i-th entry is the size of action or deals per unit of time, metric: $\frac{m_i}{m_{time}}$
• $J$: scalar. Energy power, metric: $\frac{m_0}{m_{time}}$

In time interval $t$, to support the action, the equation is:

$t D^T E+t J=t J G$

$t J F + t N^T = t D^T - t D^T T$

It follows:

$N^T K+ J F K+J=G J$

$N^T C = J$

If the economy is kind of central plan, the planer shall allocate the energy budget of each sector this way. The required energy power of i-th sector is $N_i K_i$, much of which will be accounted in the supply chain factors. Alternatively, the planer can also inform all the factories of the correspondent $D$, then immediately the energy power is required by $E$ of each sector. The detail of energy credit flows between all sectors including energy sector can be layout by the correspondent $D$ and $E$ and $F$ and $T$.

If some energy storage or buffer amount for inconvenient days is suggested,

• $B$: energy storage amount contributed by many sources like glucose in private human bodies, public dams, private battery banks, private gas tanks, ...etc, metric: $m_0$
• $q$: energy loss rate per unit of time in energy storage, metric: $\frac{1}{m_{time}}$
• $q' \equiv c_0 q$, metric: $\frac{1}{m_{time}}$

It follows:

$q B+N^T K+J F K + J = G J$

$q' B + N^T C=J$

If the society is mixed with and without access of energy sector, let

• $W$ be the energy power to maitain the energy buffer $B$ and the factor $N$ production without energy sector
• $a$ be the percentage with access of energy sector, metric: dimensionless

Then, the average energy loss rate, the average required energy of factors production, the average energy power come as the result in the equation:

$q B + N^T K=W$

$(a q' + (1-a) q)B + N^T (a C +(1-a)K) = a J + (1-a) W$

Below only 100% with access of energy sector is considered.

The total energy cost of i-th factor (buying factors from other sectors) is $N_i c_i$ and the additional energy cost of $q' B$ shall be paid by someone.

The ownership of piece of $B$ could be tokenized, aka, owing "one dollar" or "one food stamp" represents the ownership of 1 unit energy in the storage pool $B$. As said, there is energy cost $q' t 1_0$ to keep 1 unit energy accross a period of time $t$. In market economics, along with the transaction of 1 i-th factor, this cost $q' t c_i$ is paid from either/both the new owner of the token (seller) and the old owner of the token (buyer) to the token ownership maintainer. Suppose the i-th factor's time-to-sale is $\frac{1}{n}$ unit of time (typically a year). The number of deals in time interval $\frac{1}{n}$ is $\frac{D_i}{n}$. The fee collected per unit of time will be $\frac{D_i}{n} c_i \times \frac{q'}{n} \times n=D_i c_i \times \frac{q'}{n}$. Therefore, $B$ must be a linear form of deals and time-to-sale. In cases the cost or even the $T$ is not clearly known, for each production factors required by i-th factor, there is a difference between market price and the cost faced by the sector. The difference contributes to fee and additional surplus of the said supply chain producers. With competition, the market price will be only higher than the cost by the fee of the involved transaction. With the above kiosk plot, the kiosk may offer two methods to pay for the purchase. To buy 1 unit i-th factor, the buyer can plug in his own private battery which provides $c_i$ energy to power the whole economy, or, when both the buyer and the seller have tokens in the energy storage, he then operates the touch screen of the kiosk and accordingly a change of ownership of the amount of $c_i$ unit energy from the buyer to the seller follows, with some additional fee to the energy storage maintainer.

Size of buffer

It depends. Moving energy across time, $q B$ is also the required energy power for this protection or service.

1. in case of covering the production of $N$ without help of energy sector for time $t$, $B=t N^T K$
2. in case of covering the factors of the energy sector $F$ for time $t$
3. in case of covering the production of $N$ with help of energy sector for time $t$, $B=t N^T C$

In case 2, it sets an equation about $t$. Interestingly for sustainable economy where $N$ is zero, it leads to $q' t F C =1$ or some similar sustainable equation. This is interesting because $t$ is the nature in the production $T$ and it should have nothing to do with $F$ which is the nature in the energy production. Case 3 is the base where $t J =(1+q' t)t N^T C$ is the pool of energy input commitment with the help of energy production or mother nature. Per unit of time and per unit energy, if the cost of the token is higher than $q'$, people rather insure their bad days by themselve and opt out the economy arranged by the token. If the cost of the token is lower than $q'$, unless people blindly trust the token's maintainer, people feel it is fake and don't opt in; just like typical production, something fishy is going on when the cost is suspiciously low than that of other market perticipants, like, claiming zero cost, a token ownership maintainer practices "print money from thin air" or "you are not allowed to transfer money to Dalai Lama". When both the cost are $q'$, some people opt in and some people opt out. Over all, part of the buffer sector is tokenized and has the same cost $q'$ to be trustful without authority, the other part of the buffer sector becomes individual's property and invisible to the economy. In ancient time, the individual's property was simply their own bodies which would commit the hunting work if the payer pays the token and tells the payee to go hunting. In a future, the individual's property may be a private battery bank whose purpose is to insure the energy supply to his robots who are to do routine maintenance job of his solar farm, and, to his occasional outsiders who ask for token ownership maintainance at a price of mining fee $q' t p$ or even ask for outright supply of $p$ energy since this piece of $p$ unit energy belongs to the outsiders. Thanksfuly to fill the obligation to the outsiders the kiosk may actually, getting an energy surplus of $(1-c_0) p$, issue command to the energy sector to produce $p$ energy rather than output $p$ energy from an buffer, though. This is how a physical energy buffer is virtualized to be an energy ownership maintainer in the form of trust back by phisical energy cost.

For convenience's sake, the turnover time $t$ could be assumed the same for all sectors. If they are different among sectors, then $B=N^T t C$ where $t$ is a diagonal matrix. The fee of sectors of longer turnover time shall be higher too. The market price of factors shall be $(I+q' t)C$ if the factor buyers enjoy all the surplus.

Below is to focus on buffer design of the money flow circulating economy (case 2) and industry sector is re-defined as the production of $F$ and the correspondent supply chains other than energy. As mentioned of "hiding surplus in energy sector" above in section of scenarios modeling, this suggests a way to justify a fair surplus in order to agree with the physically known $t$ by the sustainable equation.

• $M$: matrix of m by m, metric: $m_{time}$

As long as the storage is linear about $J$ and $F$ and $C$, a typical form of the storage is of the form $B=J F M C$. Some examples:

storage for the energy portion of F's production for time t

To produce $J F$, the necessary action is

$D^T=J F (I-T)^{-1}$

Therefore,

$B=t D^T E c_0=t J F C$

It indicates

$M=t I$

This is like a society where any store is a kiosk which has all the information of factors production. When a customer puts into $c_i$ money (or energy credit) into the kiosk and demands one unit of i-th product, the kiosk immediately dispatches the action $D$ and its correspondent energy cost to all sectors. Then the product is manufactured and delivered to the customer.

buffer for all factors of F's production

Because

$D^T=J F(I-T)^{-1}$

Suppose the time-to-sale of i-th factor is $t_i$

Then, the transaction money of i-th sector for the calculation of fee is

$t_i D_i E_i c_0+\sum_j {t_i D_i T_{i j} c_j}=t_i D_i (E_i c_0+\sum_j{T_{i j}c_j})=t_i D_i c_i$

Sum over all factors, it is

$D^T \begin{bmatrix}t_1 &&& \\& t_2 && \\ && \ddots & \\&&& t_m \end{bmatrix} C=J F(I-T)^{-1}t C$

It indicates

$M=(I-T)^{-1}t$

sustainable equation

In an economy of no need to offset the cashflow gap, the equation of sustainable economy is:

$q J F M C +J+J F K=G J$

equivalently,

$q' F M C=1$

and is translated to

$\frac{q F M K}{(G-1-F K)^2}=1$

This also relates the average turn over time and $q'$ to the ratio of energy powers. If a average scalar $t$ is such that $t F C =F M C$, equivalently in eyes of energy depletion $J F C=\frac{B}{t}$, then it follows $\frac{q J F M C}{J F K}=q' t$

To see the size of the surplus,

• $b \equiv \frac{q F M K}{(G-1-F K)^2}$, the imbalance ratio of the economy
• $S \equiv \frac{(1-b)J}{c_0}$, the energy surplus of the economy

By the definition, it follows:

$q B+b J +b J F K=G b J$

However, the commit energy input is $J$, therefore, when $b$ is not 1, it means the unaccountable energy surplus or deficit $S$ distributed by force other than economics:

$q B + S+ J + J F K = G J$

As explained above, if $b$ is less than 1, the surplus factors can be artificially inflated to make the surplus accountable. Therefore,

$q B + S+ J + J F K = G J = q \hat{B}+J + J \hat {F} \hat {K}$

Then it means the surplus enjoyed by the surplus factors is:

$J \hat{F} \hat{K}-J F K =S-(q \hat{B} - q B)$

which is linear to change of $F$ if only surplus factors in $F$ is allowed to inflated due to $T$, and accordingly $K$, being intact.

With known $q$ and the average $t$, then the sustainable equation is a simple quardratic equation of $F K$. The post-inflated surplus factors in $F$ then can be near $G -1$ to reach very low $q t$ or $F$ can be small so $q t$ is large. For example, $G$ being 26 and $q$ being 0.13 and the average $t$ being 0.5, post-inflated $F K$ shall be 23.75733 and the energy cost of 1 unit energy shall be 0.804719 dollar. In formula:

$F K = G-1+\frac{q t}{2}- \sqrt{(G-1)q t+\frac{(q t)^2}{4}}$

$(\text{economic energy gain factor})=G-1-F K= \sqrt{(G-1)q t+\frac{(q t)^2}{4}} -\frac{q t}{2}$

$c_0=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(G-1)q t + \frac{(q t)^2}{4}}-\frac{q t}{2}}$

The ratio of required energy power of money sector to all energy power:

$\frac{q t J F C}{G J}=\frac{q t F C}{G}=\frac{1}{G c_0}=\frac{\sqrt{(G-1)q t + \frac{(q t)^2}{4}}-\frac{q t}{2}}{G}$

The ratio of required energy power of energy and industry sector to all energy power:

$\frac{J(1+F K)}{G J}=\frac{1+F K}{G}=\frac{c_0+F C}{G c_0}=\frac{G c_0 -1}{G c_0}=1-\frac{1}{G c_0}$

In a sense, this is equivalent to that all the $D$ is to cause an $N$ equal to $J F$ whose energy portion is transacted to get the fee. While the $J F$ is beyond the real needed factors for energy production, then it becomes the surplus. But there is a price: $c_0$ gets higher even though $G$ is huge.

surplus factors

• $\Lambda$ , the diagonal matrix of m by m indicating the augment

There are two ways to augment the surplus factors:

1. by columns: inflate the correspondent columns of the said factors in $F$ and $T$, $\hat{F}=F \Lambda$, $\hat{T}=T \Lambda$
2. by rows: inflate the correspondent rows of the said factors in $E$ and $T$, $\hat{E}=\Lambda E$, $\hat{T}=\Lambda T$

It turns out that the two methods are equivalent if the matrix $M$ as a function of the augmented matrix $T$ has the property: $\Lambda M \big(T \Lambda\big)= M \big(\Lambda T\big)\Lambda$

Take $M(T)=(I-T)^{-1} t$ for example

$\Lambda (I-T \Lambda)^{-1} t= \Lambda((\Lambda^{-1}-T)\Lambda)^{-1}t=(\Lambda^{-1}-T)^{-1}t=(\Lambda^{-1}-T)^{-1} \Lambda^{-1} \Lambda t=(I-\Lambda T)^{-1} \Lambda t=(I-\Lambda T)^{-1} t \Lambda$

Therefore, the sustainable equations are both the same:

$1=\frac{q(F \Lambda)(I-T \Lambda)^{-1}t (I-T\Lambda)^{-1} E}{(G-1-(F \Lambda)(I-T \Lambda)^{-1}E)^2}=\frac{q F(I-\Lambda T)^{-1}t (I-\Lambda T)^{-1}(\Lambda E)}{(G-1-F(I-\Lambda T)^{-1}(\Lambda E))^2}$

In a sense being greedy and being lazy are equivalent.

Estimation

By

$q B + J F K + J = G J$

it follows

$\frac{q B}{G J} + \frac{F K}{G} + \frac{1}{G}=1$

In case of sustainable economy and in terms of energy consumption, the percentages of buffer or trust sector, industry sector, and energy sector are indicated in this identity.

$\frac{1}{G c_0} + \frac{F K}{G}+\frac{1}{G}=1$

By energy sector percentage, $G$ is estimated. Knowing $G$, $c_0$ follows by buffer sector percentage. The rest is the industry sector.

$\frac{q B}{G J}=\frac{1}{G c_0}$ leads to some intersting corollaries.

impact of socialism

The larger the buffer or trust sector the cheaper the energy price. In socialism, anything is planned and individuals don't have buffer. This means socialism has a higher cost of energy for almost everything than the cost of free commercialism because of energy's role in everything. The $\sum_i {t_i E_i c_0}$ and $\sum_i {\sum_j {t_i D_i T_{i j} c_j}}$ are for the two examples in the section of size of buffer above. Obviously, size of buffer of example 2 is larger.

mining energy power

As $q B = \frac{1}{c_0} J$, the cost power of buffer sector is the economic energy gain factor times the input power of energy sector, suggesting the upper bound of mining energy power of a proof-of-work token or the upper bound of traditional cost power of guards/safety in trust factors. One up, the other down.

money volume and purchasing power of money

Let

• $V$, coin volumne, scalar, metric: dimensionless
• $P$, energy per coin also represents purchasing power of 1 coin because physically it requires 9.8 joules for moving 1 kilo gram 1 meter higher thousand years before and after, metric: $m_0$

As $B=J F M C$, the "one dollar is one unit energy" setting is in fact $P=1_0$ and $V=\frac{J F M C}{1_0}$. However, historically many shortcomings of coin volume inflation were shown with the design of variant $V$.

As mining power of a proof-of-work token is $q B = \frac{1}{c_0} J$ proportional to the size of the economy $G J$, other arrangement to ease or to avoid the shortcomings is possible. Two illustrated examples.

==== example 1 ====

$P=\frac{1}{c_0} J 1_{time}$, then by $B = J F M C = P V$, it follows $V=\frac{c_0 F M C}{1_{time}}$ which is much stable than the volume at $\frac{J F M C}{1_0}$ previously.

==== example 2 ====

$V$ is a fixed number and $P=\frac{J F M C}{V}$ then $P$ is proportional to the size of the economy. As mining energy power and the mining fee are objective, $P$ being the mining power divided by fee in terms of coins per unit time has no room to be fishy and everyone shares the same fruits before and after economy growth. Also, as mining power is $q B = q P V$ which is $P \times (\text{fee coins per unit time})$. It leads to $(\text{fee coins per unit time})=q V$. Mathematically, change of $P$ and fixed constant $V$ is the same as the case of $P=1_0$ with distribution of new coins or trashing of old coins at same ratio by the coins stake of individuals that however is hardly done unless in technology / politics autocrat with tight central control, though. With formula mentioned above, as energy gain factor $G$ gets higher and the surplus is absorbed, energy price $c_0$ and percentage of mining power of the society $\frac{1}{G c_0}$ are getting lower at the pace of $\frac{1}{\sqrt{G}}$ and $P$ is getteing higher at the pace of $\sqrt{G}$. The mining power will never drain the whole economy energy power. But while the mining task replaces traditional trust sector like banking and ownership maintainance sector, the crystal clear objective cost of mining might be shocking as the guard cost of traditional method is opaque and hardly questioned.

All the above is demostrated in the excel here: https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=176Xbb-HOy0KF761IwjETvoaFRBZa835D

While the surplus factors can be inflated in arbitrary ways to satisfy the sustainable equation, it requires some numerical procedure to find the surplus ratio. Note that the purpose of the Excel workbook and the paper is for clearness of the fundamental concept explanation. Out of curosity, I choose to inflate the surplus factors in $F$ part only rather than the whole system including $T$ part, pretty much like a society where monarch enjoys all the surplus. This way, I can solve the surplus ratio by simple quadratic equation and there is no mismatch in the audit of the paper by the Excel workbook. As explained in the section about human surplus, all entries of the column of the matrix $T$ and $F$ shall be inflated. People of all sectors, not energy sector only, shall enjoy the surplus, though. I do provide in the end of the excel a section for handling of this fair distribution with the help of goal-seek of excel on solving the sustainable equation.

Finally, I wish people could understand that:

1. in the deepest sense, money is not for "hodl" or for "earn", instead, it serves as the method of energy accounting and promotes fair and peaceful societal cooperation to share the energy surplus gifted by mother nature.
2. to establish trust in the money, it must have an objective cost aka proof-of-work where metric for work is, as taught in middle schools, energy, and any other way like proof-of-stake or "in god we trust" or whatever claims cheaper, is suggesting perpetual motion machines aka scam or religious trust in the rulers who eventually always take advantage of monopoly money issuing and play the book of "absolute power, absolute corruption".